Fairfield residents voice concerns about water usage
Looking for answers to the many questions about the future of the public water issue coming down along Route 271 and how it will affect their particular residential neighborhood, several residents attended last Thursday's Fairfield Township supervisors' meeting to make their voices heard.
Rudder Road resident Don Howard engaged in a heated discussion with supervisors about his continued use of his well water and the financial impact of the monthly surcharge fee combined with the monthly water fee that would cost him nearly $100 a month. Howard pointed his hand straight up at one point in his comments and reminded everyone present that “my water comes from above.”
Rudder Road resident Carl Howard was then quick to ask supervisors “can I still use my well water for my garden” near my mobile home?
You can continue to use your well to wash your car, water your garden and flowers, however, you must cap it off at your dwelling.” said Chairman Tantlinger said “No well water can come into your home once you have begun receiving public water.”
Proposed public water usage has become a bane of existence for many Fairfield Township residents who have long relied on their wells for their water needs and their use of their septic tanks for their sewage.
Change comes hard to these residents. The pros on the issue usually come from individuals just moving into the area and look forward to public water and, one day, possibly public sewage, as the way of modernization in country living.
Residents are reminded that their fire insurance coverage costs would decline due to unlimited water access and hydrants for fighting home fires in their area. Unfortunately, for many residents, the payoff just hasn't added up to anything more than an outlay of tap-in costs and approximately $1,200 a year for water that they have been receiving freely underground for decades.
Councilman Altimus and Chairman Tantlinger urged residents to remain calm as nothing has been decided to date.
A letter is going to be prepared, along with a survey of the projected area, and sent out to residents in that area according to tax rolls. The letter will be a combined effort of the Municipal Authority of Westmoreland County, the Fairfield Township Supervisors and the township's Solicitor Jeff Miller Esq.
The “project specific” area covers 75 dwellings that make up 111 actual lots. It is yet to be determined if the final costs would be based on the actual dwellings figure or for the lot numbers recorded on the tax rolls.
In other business:
• The supervisors unanimously agreed to fill the unexpired term on the Tri-County Sewage Authority's West Bolivar representation with Cecilia Sisitski.
Alice White is a contributing writer for Trib Total Media.
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.
- Pirates think Mercer’s defense deserves more credit
- China investigates Microsoft in monopoly case
- Roundup: Study finds 35 percent in US facing debt collectors; JPMorgan paying $650K to settle CFTC charges; more
- Valley resident new CEO at Jefferson
- Woman who stabbed while naked in McKees Rocks believed to be in New Kensington area
- Tech giants lead rush for profits in foreign countries
- Home price gains slow for 6th-straight month
- Most back Holy Family’s plan to house children who crossed border
- Jimmy Dean moves beyond breakfast
- Consumer confidence jumps to 90.9 in July
- Rayburn businessman honored for charitable work