ShareThis Page

Ball signal pole installed at Darlington Station in Ligonier

| Wednesday, Aug. 28, 2013, 9:02 p.m.
submitted
A ball signal is installed at the Ligonier Valley Rail Road Museum in Darlington. Funding for the restoration and installation was provided by the McFeely-Rogers Foundation and the Ligonier Endowment.

A new piece of history has been installed at the Ligonier Valley Rail Road Museum in Darlington. Recently, a ball signal was restored and erected on the museum grounds near the caboose.

Ball signals were a necessity in the early days of railroading as a method of signaling train movements and configurations.

The number of balls (lanterns) visible above the pole enclosure indicated what train movements would be permitted. Use of the ball signal was discontinued in the late 1960s. It has been replaced by more updated automated systems.

The signal originally stood in the rail yard at Wells River, Vt. It was mounted high above the tracks for visibility in all directions. At that time, the signal had a row of five lights for nighttime use.

The signal was acquired in 1953 by Bill Smith of Latrobe. The avid railroad memorabilia collected had it moved from Well River and installed in Latrobe.

Funding for the restoration and installation was provided by the McFeely-Rogers Foundation and the Ligonier Valley Endowment.

Deborah A. Brehun is a staff editor for Trib Total Media. She can be reached at 724-238-2111 or dbrehun@tribweb.com.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.