Laurel Valley EMS squelches rumors
By Peter Turcik
Published: Wednesday, Sept. 25, 2013, 9:00 p.m.
Amid concerns and rumors about the state of affairs for Laurel Valley EMS, the council of New Florence Borough invited members of the company to speak at the September meeting. Bob Topper, CEO of Tri-Conn Alternative Services, which manages the ambulance service, said that there is no plan to leave Laurel Valley any time soon.
“We are going nowhere. We have no intentions on leaving,” Topper stated. “Where the rumors came up that whether we were going to give notice or pull out under the cover of darkness, or any of the other things are false. Are we having some challenging times financially? Yes we are. The unfortunate fact of the matter is that in EMS there is only one way to make money, and that is to take ambulance calls. Ninety-eight percent of our revenue is generated through third-party billing. So the only way we can generate enough money to keep the doors open at Laurel Valley EMS is to run enough calls.”
Topper explained that there are not enough emergencies in the Laurel Valley area, which includes New Florence, Fairfield, St. Clair and Seward, to keep the ambulance service up and running 24-hours-a-day, seven-days-a-week. In order for Laurel Valley EMS to stay up and running, it is necessary to take calls in other jurisdictions. What this means, Topper went on, is that there will be times when the ambulance service will not be available for local emergencies.
“Having an ambulance service some of the time is better than having no ambulance all the time,” Topper commented.
In other news:
• Cindy Stevenson, president of the Cat Committee of Mount Pleasant presented information on a program called Trap/Neuter/Return, asking for the council's endorsement. Stevenson said this program is a solution to overpopulation of stray cats, whereby volunteers work with residents to trap nuisance cats, take them to veterinary clinics, where they are spayed or neutered, as well as given a rabies vaccination, and are then released.
“Although Trap/Neuter/Return is not an instant solution, I do not think it is a perfect solution either, it is the best solution that anybody has come up with yet,” Stevenson said. “The effort is to number one, stop the reproduction; you have the cat spayed or neutered so that there aren't any more kittens. That stabilizes the colony, it makes the cats healthier, and it turns them into better neighbors. A lot of times the complaints people have about stray cats are they're fighting; there is all that screeching. The same kind of noise and behavior goes with mating as it does with fighting. Once they're spayed or neutered, a lot of that behavior goes away.”
According to Stevenson, in the five years that the program has been running, volunteers have successfully trapped more than 800 cats in an area including Mt. Pleasant, Connelsville, Acme, Donegal and the Ligonier Valley.
Council president offered up the council's approval saying, “It sounds like a step in the right direction. We applaud the work on that.”
The next meeting of the Council of New Florence Borough will be 7:30 p.m. Oct. 15 at the borough's municipal offices.
Peter Turcik is a contributing writer for Trib Total Media.
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.