Ligonier Township voters approve referendum
Two more supervisor terms will be up for grabs in next year's election cycle, as the majority of voters approved a ballot referendum asking if the board should expand.
The referendum got approval from 57 percent of voters on Election Day, according to unofficial results. It was spearheaded by the Brighter Future Political Action Committee, a group of residents who gathered more than 400 signatures during the summer so the question could be placed on the ballot.
The committee said the addition of two supervisors would improve governance and oversight of township operations.
According to Pennyslvania's Second Class Township Code, a board of supervisors may consist of three members — or five, if approved by electors.
Newly elected supervisors Scott Matson and Paul E. Knupp have said they approve of the expansion, while Supervisor Tim Komar said he feels it is not necessary at this time.
An additional three-year term and a five-year term will be filled in next year's election cycle.
Also on Election Day, Republicans Carolyn R. Shafer and Kim Dickert-Wallace and Democrat John E. Maier were chosen to continue to serve on the Ligonier Valley School Board, and Republican David Wilcox has been elected to join them in January.
They defeated challengers Carl Fabrizio and Barbara Boring, both Democrats, and Republican Edward Sutter on Nov. 5 in the race for the four, four-year terms, according to unofficial election returns.
Unopposed candidate JoAnn Thistlethwaite claimed the two-year term. Thistlethwaite and the four winning candidates were endorsed by the Valley Education Political Action Committee.
Shafer received 18.2 percent of the votes, with Maier at 15.8 percent, Wallace at 15.7 percent and Wilcox at 14.7 percent.
Some of the goals the four candidates cited as part of their election platforms included connecting with the community, promoting communication between the board and public and uniting all corners of the district.
Nicole Chynoweth is a staff writer for Trib Total Media. She can be reached at 724-850-2862 or email@example.com.
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.