Ligonier Township ballot lists 3 vying for new supervisor seats
Two additional supervisor positions are available in Ligonier Township in this year's election; a three-year term and a five-year term.
Wade E. Thomas, 53, is seeking the Republican nomination for the five-year seat. He previously served a six-year term as supervisor in 1987, after which he did not seek reelection. He owns and operates George Thomas Contracting. He lives with his wife of 27 years, Kimberly, and their two children.
Bruce Robinson, 63, is vying for the Republican nomination for the three-year seat. He works as the general manager at Laurel Valley Golf Club and serves as the township secretary. He is president of the Ligonier Valley School Board, member of the Brighter Future Political Action Committee, president of the Ligonier Rotary Club and member of the Ligonier Volunteer Hose Co. No. 1.
Albert “Mike” Shadron, 58, is the sole candidate seeking the Democratic nomination for both seats. He previously served on the board after Keith Whipkey's resignation last May. Shadron has worked on the road crew for 35 years, and has been a member of the Ligonier Township Fire Department No. 1 in Waterford for 40 years. He has two daughters.
Last November, voters approved a ballot referendum in favor of expanding the three-member board of supervisors to five members.
Voters will head to the polls on May 20 to cast their ballots for the added seats.
Nicole Chynoweth is a staff writer for Trib Total Media. She can be reached at 724-850-2862 or firstname.lastname@example.org.
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.