Councilwoman faces DUI count in Duquesne
A Duquesne councilwoman is facing drunk driving charges stemming from a weekend auto accident.
Fawn Ebony McDaniel, 38, was charged with two counts of DUI and one count of reckless driving on Dec. 14, when she allegedly lost control of her 2003 Mitsubishi and struck three parked vehicles in the 1300 block of Kennedy Avenue.
Police said they responded to the scene at about 11:45 p.m. to find McDaniel's vehicle sideways in the street and touching one of the other vehicles. McDaniel was behind the wheel and appeared confused, according to police.
McDaniel, who told police that a cat ran into the roadway, failed a field sobriety test and was taken to UPMC McKeesport for blood-alcohol testing. Lab results are pending, according to police.
McDaniel, who could not be reached for comment, was released from the hospital to a friend.
Duquesne Mayor Phil Krivacek said he'd prefer to see all of the facts before commenting on the arrest.
“I feel bad for her if it's true,” he said. “We'll just wait and see how it plays out and let it take its course.”
Duquesne solicitor Jessica Crown said she could not comment on the arrest.
This is not first brush with the law for McDaniel, who was elected to council in November 2009.
Duquesne police charged her with disorderly conduct on Sept. 18. That charge was dismissed in district court on Nov. 18.
McDaniel is scheduled to appear before Forest Hills Magisterial District Judge Thomas P. Caulfield on Jan. 16 at 9 a.m. for Friday's incident.
Eric Slagle is a staff writer for Trib Total Media. He can be reached at 412-664-9161, ext. 1966, or firstname.lastname@example.org.
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments â either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.