DUI charge pending against Allegheny County councilman
Allegheny County Councilman Bob Macey, D-West Mifflin, said he is seeking help after making what he called “a stupid mistake.”
The councilman could be charged with DUI in connection with a minor crash in Venango County shortly before 8 a.m. on Dec. 22, according to state police.
Macey, 64, was traveling east on Scrubgrass Road in Irwin Township in his 2005 Chevrolet Malibu when he failed to stop at the intersection with Old Route 8, state police at the Franklin barracks said in a report. The vehicle crossed over the road and into a ditch.
“I was making a turn and my car slid into a ditch,” Macey said. “The only damage was to my car.”
The county councilman, whose District 9 includes West Mifflin and several other Mon Valley communities, said he had been drinking the night before but not at the time of the crash.
He said his family has had a cabin in the area of the accident for more than 50 years.
He said he was examined by firefighters, who summoned state police.
The state police report said Macey “was found to be under the influence of alcohol and was subsequently detained for further investigation.
He failed field sobriety testing while at the Franklin State Police station” and was transported to UPMC Northwest in Franklin for blood-alcohol testing.
Charges are pending the outcome of those tests, police said.
“I'm seeking help,” Macey said. “I apologize for what happened. It was a stupid mistake.”
Macey faces re-election in 2013 in a district that covers areas from North Versailles Township to the South Allegheny School District.
“I hope to continue to serve the residents of the Mon Valley,” Macey said.
Tribune Review News Service contributed to this story. Patrick Cloonan is a staff writer for Trib Total Media. He can be reached at 412-664-9161, ext. 1967, or email@example.com.
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.