Glassport EMS service future assured
Clairton Volunteer Fire Department's Emergency Medical Service division has acquired a building in Glassport to continue providing service to the borough.
Fire Chief John Lattanzi said the department closed on the sale of the property at 842 Monongahela Ave. on Thursday.
The EMS division rented that site since August 2011 at $650 a month.
The two-story structure was purchased from Reliance Hose Co. No. 2 for $80,000 through a seven-year mortgage.
Clairton EMS had ambulances at a building along the 700 block of Monongahela Avenue before moving to the current building for additional space.
“If we didn't buy the building, there (would) be no ambulance service out of Glassport,” Lattanzi said. “It would all come out of Clairton. We're happy we got the place.”
An ambulance and crew would have been stationed from 7 a.m. to 11 p.m. on a Glassport street if the building had not been purchased.
Reliance Hose life-member John Bender said the company voted in April to sell the building. It was appraised and posted for bid, and Clairton EMS was the highest bidder.
Reliance Hose had owned the building since 1963.
“Of course we didn't want to see the building go. It was nice of the ambulance service to purchase it,” Bender said. “They're providing a service to the borough.”
Clairton EMS houses three ambulances and other equipment at the Glassport facility, and has been the borough's official ambulance provider for at least the past 10 years.
Michael DiVittorio is a staff writer for Trib Total Media. He can be reached at 412-664-9161, ext. 1965, or firstname.lastname@example.org.
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments â either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.