McKeesport man charged with Dec. 6 murder in city
A McKeesport man accused of fatally shooting another city resident is in Allegheny County Jail without bail.
Dashawn Reid, 19, was arrested Friday and arraigned Saturday on one count of homicide.
“We were working on information received,” Allegheny County Homicide Lt. Andrew Schurman said. “We found him at an address in Castle Shannon, where he was taken into custody without incident.”
Reid allegedly shot Jesse Thornton, 23, on Dec. 6 at approximately 11:06 p.m. in Building 733 of McKeesport's Hi View Gardens apartment complex.
“We know there was a physical altercation in a hallway,” Schurman said.
According to the criminal report, four spent 9 millimeter casings and two spent projectiles were recovered from the scene.
Police suspect that when an argument between Thornton and another person escalated into a physical struggle, Reid opened the door of an apartment and shot Thornton in the back multiple times. Court documents indicate that Reid and the person with whom Thornton was arguing went back into the apartment and closed the door, but then fled the building shortly after.
A witness picked Reid from a photo array provided by police.
Thornton died on Dec. 11 at UPMC Presbyterian from multiple gunshot wounds to the torso.
Allegheny County police issued an arrest warrant on Dec. 12.
A preliminary hearing is scheduled for Friday at 8:30 a.m. in Pittsburgh Municipal Court.
Stacy Lee is a staff writer for Trib Total Media. She can be reached at 412-664-9161, ext. 1970, or firstname.lastname@example.org.
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments â either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.