Fire destroys Irwin home
Irwin firefighters saved a cat and a dog from a burning building along Tenth Street on Thursday morning.
Fire Chief Shawn Stitely said a neighbor reported smoke coming from the back of a house at 1220 Tenth St. around 9:30 a.m.
Police reported a fully engulfed house fire shortly after receiving that call.
No injuries were reported.
Ron Padolf said he received a picture of the house via text message when firefighters extinguished the blaze, and he rushed to the scene.
Padolf said his sister, Susie Zigerelli, lived in the mid-century modern-style house.
“The fire is still under investigation through Irwin Fire Department, Irwin police and the state police fire marshal,” Stitely said. “It's a multi-level single-family residential (dwelling). I would say it's a total loss. We saved a dog and a cat and there's one cat that's missing.”
North Irwin, South Greensburg and North Huntingdon Township firefighters also responded.
Stitely said the fire is believed to have started in the living room on the main level. The cause has not been determined.
Stitely said firefighters put out the flames within 35 to 40 minutes, and the freezing temperatures did not impact fighting the fire.
“Besides (cold) bodies, everything went well ... no delays of getting water, a lot of mutual aid from other companies,” Stitely said. “Everyone responded. Everyone did a great job. There were no issues.”
Michael DiVittorio is a staff writer for Trib Total Media. He can be reached at 412-664-9161, ext. 1965, or email@example.com.
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments â either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.