Duquesne schools plan recommends voluntary student transfers
The state-appointed chief recovery officer for Duquesne City School District is recommending a voluntary transfer of all elementary school students from the city's public school to other nearby districts.
“Agreements between the receiving school district(s) and Duquesne City … would be voluntary and beneficial for both districts,” according to the 112-page plan Paul B. Long issued late Monday morning.
“The receiving district would need to have adequate classroom capacity and appropriate academic programs,” Long continued. “Furthermore, the tuition would have to be affordable to Duquesne.”
The proposed voluntary transfer was one of four scenarios presented in Long's plan. He ruled out maintaining the existing kindergarten-grade 6 school in the former Duquesne High School building along Kennedy Avenue as “academically undesirable and fiscally unsustainable.”
He said existing state law would have to be changed to mandate a transfer of elementary students to other districts. Under existing law Duquesne tuitions students in grades 7-12 to East Allegheny and West Mifflin Area districts.
He also ruled out a charter school at Duquesne Education Center as “clearly not financially viable.”
A majority of members on the elected school board is behind a proposed charter school being advocated by former school board member Connie Lucas and previously rejected twice by the district's state-appointed Board of Control.
The plan must be approved by the elected school board within 10 days or the state Department of Education can seek to put Duquesne into receivership.
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments â either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.