Pittsburgh man charged in mass violence video mailing
A CP Industries worker accused of mailing DVDs of a questionable nature to other plant employees was arrested by McKeesport police on Tuesday.
Brad Lee Chamberlain, 28, of Pittsburgh is charged with mailing to five managers at the Christy Park steel manufacturing plant copies of a documentary video about mass violence.
Police said the managers received the videos at work and notified police on Feb. 4. The mailings were interpreted as a potential threat to the managers, other employees or the plant itself, according to police.
U.S. Postal Service inspectors aided local police in the investigation.
McKeesport police Capt. Tim Hanna said investigators believed from the onset the suspect likely would be a current or retired plant employee. He said police went to the plant on Tuesday and brought Chamberlain into the police station for questioning. Charges were filed following the interview.
CP Industries CEO Michael Larsen said he did not wish to comment on the matter other than to “applaud the local police department and the postal inspectors for a job well done.”
Chamberlain is charged with felony counts of terroristic threats and criminal use of a communication facility. He also is charged with five misdemeanor counts each of terroristic threats, simple assault and harassment, and a single count of disorderly conduct.
Chamberlain was arraigned on Tuesday and is being held in Allegheny County Jail on $100,000 bail. His preliminary hearing is scheduled for Feb. 25.
Eric Slagle is a staff writer for Trib Total Media. He can be reached at 412-664-9161, ext. 1966, or firstname.lastname@example.org.
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments â either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.