2nd Elizabeth DVD provides historic images
It's hard to contain the story of a community on just one DVD. Ask Lynn Rockwell, a community organizer and business owner in Elizabeth.
Several years ago she compiled a collection of past and present town photos and released them as a video documentary called “Views from Second Street.” It told the story of the heart of the borough's business district.
Rockwell sold about 250 copies, priced at $10 each, in her restaurant, Rockwell's Red Lion, and used the proceeds to fund the Monongahela Chapter of the Lewis and Clark Trail Heritage Foundation and the Plum Street Project's Sounds of Summer concert series.
Now Rockwell has turned her focus to other parts of the borough in a follow-up documentary called “The Second DVD.” It offers a historical tour of Town Hill, Walker's Heights, Third Street and Lower Elizabeth.
“There was so much there,” Rockwell said. “We just put the pictures in a geographical order.”
As on the first DVD, Rockwell's father serves as narrator.
“It's just stuff from my memory,” Orrie Rockwell Jr., 74, who has lived in Elizabeth all of his life, said of his commentary.
He said the new DVD offers great images of the town's old schools, churches and cemeteries. Some of the images date from the pre-automobile period, while others were taken recently, he said.
Both videos are about 90 minutes long.
A third documentary about the areas around Railroad and First streets and the town's ties to the Monongahela River is in the works. Anyone with pertinent photos who wants to contribute is asked to contact the restaurant at 412-384-3909.
Eric Slagle is a staff writer for Trib Total Media. He can be reached at 412-664-9161, ext. 1966, or firstname.lastname@example.org.
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments â either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.