ShareThis Page

Duquesne board rejects financial recovery plan

| Thursday, Feb. 21, 2013, 10:30 p.m.

Duquesne City School District's board of directors voted 8-0 with one abstention on Thursday night to reject a financial recovery plan presented by a state-appointed officer.

“We did not get a chance to digest that plan,” board president Dewayne Tucker said after a meeting in which no support was shown for the state plan.

Recovery officer Paul B. Long's plan calls for the voluntary transfer of all elementary students to other districts at a tuition of about $8,000 each. Students in grades 7-12 already are going to East Allegheny and West Mifflin Area.

“I didn't particularly want to vote it down,” director Burton Comensky said in explaining his abstention. “And I didn't want to vote against the board.”

Tim Eller, spokesman for the state Department of Education, said: “As a result of the board's action, as required the School District Financial Recovery law, the (Education) Secretary will petition to the county court of common pleas for the appointment of a receiver over the district.

“... The law states that the district shall not be eligible for a financial recovery transitional loan and technical assistance from the department,” Eller said.

Long said state Education Secretary Ron Tomalis “hasn't asked me” to become the receiver. “I don't want to speculate on what the receiver's options would be.”

Long had a list of 11 school districts — including Brentwood, Norwin and South Park Township — where Duquesne high school students could be sent. Two of the 11, Elizabeth Forward and South Allegheny, have rejected Long's proposal.

“This is not in our children's best interest to send (them) that far,” Duquesne resident Lina Washington told the board. “Brentwood? South Park Township? Don't let this go through.”

Districts under consideration include: East Allegheny and West Mifflin, Baldwin-Whitehall, Gateway, Pittsburgh Public Schools and West Jefferson Hills.

Robert Stump, a retired educational consultant from Duquesne, suggested that the board “take a little more time before you vote.”

However, solicitor Andrew Evankovich said there was no more time because under state Act 141 the board was at the end of a 10-day period for considering Long's plan.

If the Duquesne receiver can't get other districts to accept the city's students by fall, Long said, “then we will need to continue to plan to have (kindergarten through sixth grade) here.”

Patrick Cloonan is a staff writer for Trib Total Media.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.