ShareThis Page

Hearing continued in alleged theft from Forward Township Girl Scouts

| Tuesday, Feb. 26, 2013, 3:26 a.m.

The preliminary hearing for a Forward Township woman accused of stealing $1,873 from the account she managed for a local Girl Scout troop has been continued until May 6.

Mary Beth Popham, 44, had her hearing which was scheduled for Monday moved because she had not yet been fingerprinted as she is required to by the court.

Popham was charged by township police after Girl Scout Troop 54215 officials discovered on the troop's October bank statement the account she managed was nearly depleted of funds. The related theft charge was filed on Nov. 30.

Five days later, Popham was arrested by Elizabeth Township police after she was discovered passed out in a minivan that was parked with its engine running in the Mount Vernon Presbyterian Church parking lot at about 1 a.m. The complaint says that Popham was leaning on the steering wheel and the horn was sounding as the officer approached the van. She was charged with DUI for that incident.

Both cases will be heard at the May hearing.

Eric Slagle is a staff writer for Trib Total Media. He can be reached at 412-664-9161, ext. 1966, or eslagle@tribweb.com.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.