West Mifflin police say woman's assault story is a hoax
A reported attempted kidnapping and possible assault at a bus stop in West Mifflin has turned out to be a hoax.
Heather Heath, 22, a student of Empire Beauty School, told authorities a white man, standing approximately 5 feet 6 inches to 5 feet 7 inches tall and weighing between 167 and 170 pounds, attempted to abduct her on Monday at 9:28 p.m. along Century Drive.
She reported the man used some type of liquid substance in the attack, and was wearing a green jacket with pockets in the front, possibly blue jeans and a multi-colored hat.
Police Chief Kenneth Davies said police responded to the call within two minutes of being notified of the attack, but did not locate the man.
The alleged victim — who, according to Trib Total Media news exchange partner WPXI-11 was pregnant — was taken to UPMC Mercy for evaluation but reported no specific injury.
“The West Mifflin Police Department did conduct a thorough investigation of this incident, looking at all physical evidence as well as video surveillance evidence in the area,” Davies said. “Based on that evidence we again spoke with the victim and on Friday (police) obtained a verbal and written statement from the alleged victim ... that the abduction never occurred. That in fact the fluid on her face, jacket and personal items was water, and she had falsely reported the entire event.
“At this time we are considering criminal charges and/or other mental health options as (we) proceed.”
No further information was available at presstime.
Michael DiVittorio is a staff writer for Trib Total Media. He can be reached at 412-664-9161, ext. 1965, or firstname.lastname@example.org.
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments â either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.