ShareThis Page

Duquesne parents, students seek answers

| Saturday, March 23, 2013, 1:21 a.m.

Duquesne residents have mulled over alternatives during 13 years of direct state control of its public schools.

Iyana Tennon offers her nonpublic Virtuous Academy.

Tennon has had only a handful of students since she opened her doors in 2008. She offers a “positive” choice for up to 100 students in 2013-14.

The city's public Duquesne Education Center has approximately 400 students in kindergarten through sixth grade.

“Virtuous Academy is a worthy investment into a child's academic success and future,” Tennon said as she planned an open house, slated for Thursday from 6-8 p.m. at the academy's latest location, One Library Place.

Tennon focuses on science, technology, engineering, art and mathematics. She now has a second teacher.

“Victoria Reusch is a wonderful addition,” Tennon said. “Her professionalism and high expectation of student achievement keeps students engaged and looking forward to her class.”

Others sought Duquesne charter schools. In 2006 Propel chose the city for its first high school, something it later located in Munhall.

Duquesne City School District's state-appointed Board of Control did with the Pittsburgh-based charter school operator what it later did with former city school board member Connie Lucas' plans.

“Propel did pursue the charter in Harrisburg after the Board of Control failed to act on its charter application,” Propel spokeswoman Angela Gaitaniella said. “When we did, the (Charter School) Appeal Board said that because of Duquesne's status, it was under no obligation to vote at all.”

The BOC also failed to act on two plans from Lucas. She withdrew one after district Superintendent Paul Rach produced more than 100 objections. Her second plan never received consideration as the BOC went out of business.

Under state Act 141 of 2012, Duquesne was declared by education secretary Ron Tomalis to be in severe financial recovery and the BOC was replaced by chief recovery officer Paul B. Long.

Like Propel, Lucas appealed to Harrisburg, but she's still waiting for her day before the Charter School Appeal Board.

Pennsylvania Department of Education spokesman Tim Eller said Tuesday's appeal board hearing was canceled.

Meanwhile, Long offered a recovery plan with four scenarios. The elected Duquesne school board rejected it, prompting a PDE petition to put the district into receivership with Long in charge.

Allegheny County Common Pleas Judge Judith L.A. Friedman continues a hearing on that petition until April 2.

Long and PDE preferred a voluntary transfer of Duquesne elementary students to any of 11 districts. All turned him down or took no action on his request.

On Tuesday, state Sen. James Brewster, D-McKeesport, sent a Right-to-Know request to Tomalis for a list of all districts on the state's watch list.

“We have been told that (Gov. Tom Corbett's administration) has been looking specifically at a number of schools that may be declared distressed,” Brewster said.

Brewster believes some of those schools also are in his 45th District, as is Duquesne.

“The department is not aware of any requests from the senator that have gone unanswered,” Eller said. “The department provides information to both members and staff of the General Assembly when it is requested.”

The PDE spokesman said his department listed information about the early warning system on its website.

Propel no longer seeks a school in Duquesne but does take Duquesne youngsters.

“Propel is always looking for ways to pursue its mission of improving access to high quality schools,” Gaitaniella said. “All Propel schools are open to applicants from Duquesne school district, and any other school district.”

Propel has taken applications for 2013-14 since Oct. 1.

“We have received about 150 applications from Duquesne, the majority applying to our Homestead and McKeesport schools, both kindergarten through eighth grade,” Gaitaniella said.

Patrick Cloonan is a staff writer for Trib Total Media.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.