Penneco to extend drilling lease in White Oak
White Oak council unanimously approved the signing of an agreement extension with Penneco earlier this week for a leasing gas drilling privilege at Heritage Hill Park for as long as five years.
Penneco will pay the borough $10,000.
White Oak Councilman Kenneth Robb said Penneco previously had options to drill at Heritage Hill Park and on White Oak Athletic Association property.
“It seems we will not be drilling at the athletic association,” he said. “They had an option to drill at Heritage Hill and they just renewed their option. They had an option to drill at the athletic association, but they didn't ask to renew it.”
“This is an extension of the existing agreement whereby we'll earn $10,000,” council president Dave Pasternak said.
He said council had public meetings on the matter prior to executing the agreement originally a few years ago.
No date has been set for drilling to begin.
“The market is on the low side for that commodity so I don't think that there will be any drilling in the near future,” borough secretary Nancy Greenland said.
Robb said the shallow drilling doesn't involve fracking and runoff issues like Marcellus shale drilling.
“If they put it in Heritage Hill Park, it would be away from the public,” he said. “We have the rights under the option to tell them we want it here and we don't want it there.”
Stacy Lee is a staff writer for Trib Total Media. She can be reached at 412-664-9161, ext. 1970, or email@example.com.
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments â either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.