West Elizabeth seeks estimates to repair municipal building
West Elizabeth is getting an estimate this week on the cost of repairing the municipal building.
“The foundation is sinking in the middle,” Councilwoman Janet Isaacs said. “There are stress fractures all over the building, as well.”
She said a structural engineer from Alltech Engineering & Home Inspection Services recently assessed the building located at 800 Fourth St.
“There's a problem,” Isaacs said. “It's not a bad problem, but it's definitely a problem.”
She said she will have as many as three companies give free estimates on lifting the foundation.
Isaacs said the structural engineer also noted the waterspouts on the corners of the building should be extended.
Borough code enforcement officer Bill Wolfgang asked if council wanted him to call a company named Geese Police to use dogs to chase away the geese in West Elizabeth Ball Field.
“They do it three times daily,” he said. “They do it by the week and it's $350 for the week.”
Wolfgang said it's nesting time for the geese so the borough has to deal with them soon.
Council vice president Frank Magill asked if the geese are still in the ballpark because the ground has been fixed and there are no longer puddles of water.
Contractor Ray Dodds said he didn't see any when he was refurbishing the ball field and installing French drains.
“Sometimes there are none there,” Wolfgang said. “Sometimes there's like 20 to 25.”
“I went by several times and saw the geese between the ball field and Water Street,” Councilman Daryl Celestino said.
Magill said Wolfgang should wait a couple weeks before making any moves to hire the Geese Police.
Stacy Lee is a staff writer for Trib Total Media. She can be reached at 412-664-9161, ext. 1970, or firstname.lastname@example.org.
Subscribe today! Click here for our subscription offers.
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.