Code enforcement officer approved on full-time basis
Homestead has hired Keith Evers as its full time code enforcement officer.
Council voted on Thursday to make Evers the building code official/zoning officer for $20.67 per hour beginning April 29.
The borough has already been contracting with Evers' company Consulting LLC for part-time code enforcement services the past several months.
“We're expecting him to go around and make these property owners clean up the debris,” council vice president Barbara Broadwater said. “I'm sure we're going to see our borough cleaned up.”
The majority of Homestead council terminated the borough's last code enforcement officer Thom Betz on July 26. He filed a lawsuit against Homestead on Sept. 6, claiming council was retaliating against him for distributing business privilege tax applications on Jan. 9, 2012 to three jitney stands along Ann Street in the borough. Betz claimed two councilors, Zaneta Hines and Ron Blount, were jitney drivers.
In court papers, Homestead officials deny this and say it was for work-related issues.
Council also hired Luke Taylor through the Local Government Academy Internship Program to be a summer intern for $10 per hour.
Borough manager Ian McMeans said Taylor will primarily be writing grants.
Stacy Lee is a staff writer for Trib Total Media. She can be reached at 412-664-9161, ext. 1970, or email@example.com.
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.