Liberty reduces property taxes by 10 percent
Liberty's 17 percent increase in reassessed property values is translating — so far — into a 10 percent millage reduction.
“I hope it is not cutting it too close,” Solicitor George Gobel told Liberty council prior to its vote on Wednesday to approve a reduction from 5 to 4.5 mills. “There are still some major appeals outstanding.”
The reduction is from 4 to 3.6 mills for the general fund, 1 to 0.9 for the fire tax. Each mill nets approximately $87,000.
Gobel said the neutral rate was pegged at 3.35 mills, with 0.25 mills allowed to keep the borough within the state's 5 percent windfall limit in the year after a reassessment.
Gobel said he found humor in county controller Chelsa Wagner's claim that she would be a watchdog over the assessment process.
“Every problem we have had with this issue was created by Allegheny County,” the solicitor said.
Council again held off payment of McKee Paving's $167,685 bill for last year's street work. Finance chairman Janice Matyasovsky said a state loan to cover that bill still has not arrived.
She said the state required a separate bank account be opened before it would process the loan, but the state waited too long and the account was closed by First Commonwealth Bank.
At council health and ordinance chairman Jesse Paradise's motion, a hearing was authorized about the adoption of codifying ordinances. It will be held sometime around next month's council meeting.
Patrick Cloonan is a staff writer for Trib Total Media.
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments â either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.