ShareThis Page

Changing their stripes

| Friday, April 26, 2013, 8:57 p.m.

‘Lucy and Wayne's Smokin' Flames'

Hymn for Her (self-released)

★★★★

Just when you think you've got a handle on Hymn for Her, the talented duo comprised of Lucy Tight and Wayne Waxing (the stage names used by Maggi Jane and Pierce Ternay) take an other unexpected turn. They debuted in 2008 as an understated folk act and their first full-length “Year of the Golden Pig” was quite promising. By the time 2010 rolled around, however, Hymn for Her had morphed into a “white trash country” outfit and sophomore set “Lucy & Wayne and the Amairican Stream” was even better than its predecessor. They've reinvented themselves for the third time in as many records on “Lucy and Wayne's Smokin' Flames,” emerging as a White Stripes-ish blues-rock duo.

The latest transformation works (though I prefer the raunchy country of “Amairican Stream”) and Hymn for Her stomp their way through a dozen songs filled with fuzzy guitars, plenty of distortion and a heaping helping of blues wail. Opener “Mojave” is jolting for those not knowing what to expect from the band's latest sound, and Hymn for Her also score with “Trash the Sun,” “Landescape,” “Burn This” and “For the Dead.” Wonder what Lucy & Wayne will come up with next.

Jeffrey Sisk is an editor for Trib Total Media. Reach him at 412-664-9161 ext. 1952, or jsisk@tribweb.com.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.