Irwin woman waives preliminary hearing on drug, child endangerment charges
An Irwin woman waived her preliminary hearing on drug and child endangerment charges on Wednesday.
Katelyn Sue Jones, 22, was arrested along with two 16-year-old males for allegedly running a heroin ring out of her Villages of Easton apartment.
She faces three felony drug possession counts and a misdemeanor count of endangering the welfare of her 3-year-old daughter. The child allegedly was present when her mother drove a dealer to Penn Hills to purchase heroin.
The two males, from Penn Hills and Turtle Creek, reportedly are in juvenile custody on drug possession charges. The male from Penn Hills also is charged with a firearms violation.
Details on their case were not available at presstime.
North Huntingdon Township Magisterial District Judge Douglas R. Weimer Jr. set formal arraignment for Jones on June 12 at 9 a.m. in Courtroom 6 of the Westmoreland County courthouse in Greensburg.
She is being held in the county prison in Hempfield Township in lieu of $75,000 bond.
Jones and the two males were arrested two weeks ago by county detectives, state police from Greensburg and local police from Irwin and North Huntingdon.
Township Chief Andrew J. Lisiecki said Jones' daughter was turned over to the custody of the child's father.
Patrick Cloonan is a staff writer for Trib Total Media. He can be reached at 412-664-9161, ext. 1967, or firstname.lastname@example.org.
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments â either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.