Brush fires blaze along rails in several Mon Valley towns
Firefighters from several communities responded to multiple brush fires along Norfolk Southern train tracks from Dravosburg to West Mifflin on Monday evening.
At least six fires were reported on the embankment in Dravosburg and West Mifflin. White smoke filled that section of the Mon Valley.
“Service on that line was not disrupted,” Norfolk Southern public relations manager Dave Pidgeon said.
The fires could be seen along the railroad tracks between the W.D. Mansfield Memorial Bridge and Coal Valley Road shortly before 5:30 p.m.
Glassport fire Chief Wayne Lewis said a hot wheel on a passing train may have sparked the blazes.
Pidgeon said the fires are under investigation.
First responders from Glassport doused two of the hot spots just below the bridge in Dravosburg before moving to other spots farther south down the line.
Dravosburg firefighters said the small brush fires spread from the borough toward Clairton.
Route 837 was closed to traffic until about 7 p.m. West Mifflin and Clairton police directed traffic near the intersection of Route 837 and New England Road near the Valley Hotel, allowing only emergency vehicles onto the state road.
Fishermen along the Monongahela River in Glassport said they could see smoke through the trees downstream across the river.
Clairton, Jefferson Hills, Duquesne and West Mifflin firefighters and the Salvation Army also responded.
Firefighters began clearing the scene around 7 p.m. No injuries were reported.
Michael DiVittorio and Eric Slagle are staff writers for Trib Total Media. Reach DiVittorio at 412-664-9161 ext. 1965, or firstname.lastname@example.org. Reach Slagle at 412-664-9161 ext. 1966, or email@example.com.
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments â either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.