Elizabeth Forward student earns spot at Naval Academy
Elizabeth Forward senior Katelyn Shinavski is athletic, loves the ocean and is strong academically. She visited Pearl Harbor once while vacationing in Hawaii and is interested in science.
It's a combination of traits and experiences that seem to be coming together for the 18-year-old, who'll be attending the U.S. Naval Academy in Annapolis, Md., in the fall.
On Friday, she was recognized at school for being appointed to the prestigious institution.
In addition to celebrating with school friends, staff and family members, Katelyn received a visit from Louis Lazzaro of U.S. Rep. Tim Murphy's office, who presented her with a declaration from Congress recognizing her for her accomplishment.
Murphy sent a letter to the academy nominating Katelyn for consideration.
Lazzaro noted, “Many students are nominated but few are appointed.” He said about 17,000 students apply to the academy each year of which only 1,200 are selected.
“This is a great accomplishment,” he said.
High school principal Randal Sydeski said this is only the second time during his career where he's had a student selected for the academy.
Lee Ann Shinavski said the academy has long been on her daughter's mind.
“She's always been a leader in my eyes,” the mother said.
Appointment to the academy includes tuition and room and board and pays students a salary. When they graduate in four years they enter the Navy or Marine Corps as an officer.
Katelyn has been an active student in high school, playing softball and volleyball, and was president of The Future is Mine Club.
Katelyn said of the appointment, “I've always wanted to be in the Navy and serve my country and this is the best way.”
Eric Slagle is a staff writer for Trib Total Media. He can be reached at 412-664-9161, ext. 1966, or firstname.lastname@example.org.
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.