ShareThis Page

Some millage up, some down in Norwin

Michael DiVittorio
| Tuesday, May 14, 2013, 4:11 a.m.

Depending on where you live in Norwin School District, your real estate taxes could rise or fall in the fiscal year beginning July 1.

District officials plan to hike the Westmoreland County millage by .65 mills and pull roughly $554,000 from the district surplus to balance the 2013-2014 preliminary budget.

District director of business affairs John Wilson presented the financial plan at Monday night's workshop meeting.

Wilson said reassessments in Allegheny County will force a 3.77-mill reduction for 21 property owners in White Oak and South Versailles Township who pay Norwin taxes under Allegheny County court order.

He said Norwin cannot raise its millage in Westmoreland County any higher than 0.65 mills. Previously the school board planned a 1.5 mill increase allowed under the state's Act 1 index. Wilson said the Allegheny County cap trumps the state's index.

The projected millage rate for next year's budget is roughly 9.6 mills in Allegheny County, and 69.1 mills in Westmoreland County.

Wilson noted Norwin has the lowest millage rate among Westmoreland County school districts, and has been the lowest or second lowest for each of the past 10 years.

Tentative budget figures list revenue at $60,090,000 and expenses at $61,463,000 without the use of the fund balance.Wilson said the projected fund balance is $4.05 million as of June 30, and it's expected to rise to $4.27 million at the end of the 2013-14 school year.

Revenue is projected to increase by 4.1 percent and expenses by 4.3 percent for the 2013-14 school year, according to the presentation.

The proposed budget includes eight professional retirements and two resignations, with three of the professional positions not being replaced.

It also contains a reduction in hours for part-time workers, but no further cuts in academic or athletic programs, Wilson said.

District officials were considering consolidating middle school athletic teams and moving ninth-grade teams to the junior varsity level.

Wilson said that is no longer on the table.

He said cuts in all levels of staffing are on the table, along with commercial real estate appeals, increased investment earnings, licensing of district apparel to Walmart and Dick's Sporting Goods, a new copier lease at a lower cost, and possible reductions of workers' compensation premiums, special education tuition and all levels of staffing.

Projected local revenues include $25,491,000 in real estate taxes, $2,070,000 in delinquent taxes, $5,289,000 in other taxes and $1,301,000 in other local revenue.

State revenue includes $15,330,000 in basic education subsidy, $2,511,000 in special education subsidy, $950,000 in property tax reduction, $2,587,000 in retirement subsidy, $1,174,000 in Social Security subsidy, $1,191,000 in debt service subsidy and $224,000 in other state subsidies.

Projected expenses include $28.5 million for salaries, $13.4 million for benefits, $6.7 million for debt service, $3.5 million for transportation, $1.8 million for maintenance, $1.7 million for out-of-district placement, $1.9 million for special education, $1.3 million for building, athletic and student activities allocations, $903,000 for technology and $1.8 million for miscellaneous costs.

School directors are expected to approve the preliminary budget at next Monday's regular meeting. Wilson said it will be advertised and available for public comment by May 22. A proposed final budget is planned for June 10 with final budget adoption set for June 19.

Michael DiVittorio is a staff writer for Trib Total Media. He can be reached at 412-664-9161, ext. 1965, or

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.