'True Blue' archetype for modern jazz
‘True Blues'Various artists (Telarc)
If you are looking for an archetypal jazz album for the modern era, “True Blues” might be the right one for your collection.
This is “da blues” if you ask me: Straight forward and done by musicians who take the art form very seriously.
Taj Mahal, Shemekia Copeland, Phil Wiggins, Alvin Youngblood Hart and Guy Davis bring it on home on this 13-track release with blues styles that run the gamut from early Mississippi stuff to later electric thumpers.
You suspect it's going to be that kind of record with the opener “Hoochie Coochie Man” and it is. “Motherless Children,” “Done Changed My Way of Living” and “Gallows Pole” are a few other titles that make this undoubtedly one of the most faithful blues CDs I've heard in a while.
‘I thought About You (A Tribute to Chet Baker)'
Elaine Elias (Concord Jazz)
It's a little like going through a time warp listening to this tribute album to jazz trumpeter Chet Baker.
Elaine Elias, a Brazilian singer of the modern era, takes an earnest shot at interpreting the mid-century musician's work and, in my opinion, comes close to hitting the mark.
Not that I'm an expert on Baker but this collection easily sounds like it could have been released sometime around 1961.
The sound quality is much better of course, but, in terms of arrangement, vocal styling and song choice, well I can easily picture Don Draper from “Mad Men” having this one on the hi-fi.
Elias' voice is intriguing and the Brazilian inflection she gives to the 14 songs on the disk give the album a hip, retro and somewhat strange feel.
Put this one on the next time you throw someone a surprise birthday party.
Eric Slagle is a reporter for Trib Total Media. He can be reached at firstname.lastname@example.org.
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments â either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.