Jefferson Hills police warn residents of burglaries
A sign of warmer weather is turning up on police reports in Jefferson Hills.
Borough police said on Thursday the number of burglaries has spiked from one in April to five since May 1.
“It's happening throughout the borough,” Chief Gene Roach said. Calls have been received from along Route 885, Old Clairton, Gill Hall and Ridge roads and Waterman Road East.
It is activity that apparently involves somewhat transient people passing by.
“They're on streets where there is a good deal of traffic going on,” Roach said, “and they can go back onto that main street and just blend in with the traffic. They're not in the cul-de-sacs and they're not doing it in denser neighborhoods.”
Large items such as television sets aren't turning up missing.
“They're taking jewelry and money, things they can pocket,” Roach said. “They're usually people who are drug abusers who are looking for things they can swap for their drug of choice on the street.”
Jefferson Hills residents received a Nixle alert about the burglaries in emails on Thursday.
A borough resident sharing the information on Facebook observed that “this happened a few years ago as well and wondered, ‘Same people again?'”
“Every spring we get a spike,” Roach said. “People are a little more transient, while during the winter people may be more noticeable.”
The Jefferson Hills chief urged neighbors to be the police department's eyes and ears and to call 911 if they see something “even remotely out of place.”
Patrick Cloonan is a staff writer for Trib Total Media. He can be reached at 412-664-9161, ext. 1967, or firstname.lastname@example.org.
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments â either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.