Seismic testing ordinance under development in Jefferson Hills
Jefferson Hills council gave a green light to develop two natural gas-related ordinances.
At its meeting on Monday council authorized advertising an ordinance that would regulate seismic testing.
Borough planner and zoning officer Allen Cohen is writing that ordinance. Solicitor William Shimko expects Cohen to finish the work by June 30 so it can be advertised before council's July 8 meeting.
Council also adopted a resolution setting the stage for a hearing sometime in August on an oil and gas drilling ordinance. Development of that ordinance has been on the back burner pending a state Supreme Court ruling on the commonwealth's Act 13.
The high court hasn't acted since arguments last October.
Since then, EQT Corp., Geokinetics and Cougar Land Services started seeking permission for testing in an area from Pleasant Hills to Donora.
In Jefferson Hills, what started out as a borough-wide canvassing effort was redirected by the three companies toward the Floreffe area.
Council approved a series of actions to amend the borough police pension plan.
Finance director and acting manager Andrew McCreery said the retirement age was reduced from 55 to 50 for officers with 25 years of service; vesting language in the collective bargaining agreement with Teamsters Local 205 was brought in line with state Act 600; and a killed-in-service benefit was eliminated because it's been funded since 2009 by the commonwealth.
McCreery took over for Douglas Arndt after he took a leave three months ago.
Borough officials continue to decline comment on reasons for the leave but expect Arndt to return.
Councilman Tracey Khalil hailed the work of borough staffers during that leave.
Patrick Cloonan is a staff writer for Trib Total Media. He can be reached at 412-664-9161, ext. 1967, or email@example.com.
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.