ShareThis Page

Hearing delayed for Liberty care home drug theft suspects

Michael DiVittorio
| Wednesday, June 12, 2013, 4:26 a.m.

A preliminary hearing has been postponed again for three people accused of taking prescription drugs from patients at Liberty Manor Personal Care Home.

Glassport Magisterial District Judge Armand A. Martin granted the prosecution's request on Tuesday because crime lab results were not available.

The hearing has been moved to July 2 at 12:30 p.m.

The care home's administrator, William Garvin, 67, of Elizabeth Township, faces charges of drug possession, possession with intent to deliver, theft, receiving stolen property and criminal conspiracy.

The facility's former supervisor, Lori Jarusinsky, 37, of McKeesport, and another employee, Mary Cherny, 26, of Liberty, are charged with drug possession, theft, criminal conspiracy and receiving stolen property.

Garvin's attorney, Michael Pribanic, said the prosecution had enough time to prepare for the case, and objected to the postponement.

“This whole thing with Mr. Garvin is absolutely absurd,” Pribanic told the judge.

Outside the courthouse, Pribanic said it's not unusual for crime lab results to be delayed.

“What is unusual is for a magistrate to postpone a case twice when the prosecution clearly has not acted diligently,” Pribanic said. “They've had these alleged drugs since March 3, and they've done nothing about it. That's more a problem about this case than the crime lab.”

An April 23 hearing was postponed because an officer was unavailable.

“Twice I've had a pharmacist here to testify that the controlled substance, as they allege, is not a controlled substance,” Pribanic said. “Even if it was, Mr. Garvin is an administrator of a personal care home. (He) has every right, and is authorized by state law, to possess and distribute those medications.”

The police investigation began on March 1 when Cherny reported to police that Jarusinsky stole clonazepam from a patient who had moved out of the care home on Feb. 25. Cherny alleged her supervisor took 96 pills and gave her 102 pills on Feb. 26.

Liberty police Officer Ray Johnson said Cherny is being charged because she waited four days to report the incident to police. Cherny surrendered to Johnson 21 tablets believed to be acetaminophen and hydrocodone bitartrate, and 10 pills believed to be Trazondone, according to the criminal complaint. She claimed those pills were given to her by Jarusinsky a few months prior.

Attorney Charles LoPresti, who represents Cherny, said his client has been unable to find work because of the allegations.

“When you have a case that gets blown into the media like this, unfortunately you try to get a job at a pizza shop and they see you on the monitor up there,” LoPresti said. “You get into a situation where nobody wants to hire you while a case is pending.”

Liberty police executed search warrants on March 3 at the care home and at Jarusinsky's McKeesport residence.

Johnson said police confiscated 96 clonazepam pills, 98 acetaminophen pills and 10 Vicodin pills from Jarusinsky's home and vehicle.

He said Jarusinsky claimed that, months before the search, Garvin gave her an ex-patient's acetaminophen pills, which had to be obtained by prescription because of the high, 650-milligram dosage.

Officers found 100 acetaminophen and other prescription pills scattered about, and 24 coffee cans of old needles, during a March 3 search of the care home. Another search the following day brought the total to more than 2,000 pills prescribed to former patients found in Garvin's office and a back room.

Approximately 200 more cans of old syringes were discovered, as well.

The state Department of Public Welfare shut down the care home on March 4 and relocated 29 residents to other facilities or to relatives' homes.

Former Liberty Manor residents or their relatives who have questions may call the state Department of Public Welfare at 877-401-8835.

Michael DiVittorio is a staff writer for Trib Total Media. Reach him at 412-664-9161 ext. 1965.

, or

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.