Power Trip brings back the thrash
Power Trip (Southern Lord)
Modern thrash has been dull and uninspired, the bands completely uneducated on what made the genre special and explosive in the '80s. Yet Power Trip gets it.
On its eight-track debut record, the Texas-based crossover thrash band gets nasty and brutal, and it will make those who grew up with the genre throw fists in the air on crushers “Heretic's Fork,” “Conditioned to Death” and “Crossbreaker.” This is the real thing, and Power Trip is the best modern thrasher going.
Canadian electronic pop band Austra might remind some of a mix between Bjork and their country mates Young Galaxy, and the band's excellent second album is charged with heartbreak, passion, and Katie Stelmanis' quivery voice.
The 12-track sophomore record is a stunner, but one that might take time to settle in. But once it does, you're bound to count high points “What We Done,” tarnished “Home,” and devastating closer “Hurt Me Now” as mood changers.
‘Innocence Is Kinky'
Jenny Hval (Rune Grammofon)
Nordic experimentalist Jenny Hval could curdle your blood with her music and her words. Striking some of the same notes as Kate Bush and Bat for Lashes, her music is esoteric and off putting but also infectious.
She does not hold her tongue lyrically, as you'll find on the striking title cut, which drips in sexual imagery, and she goes back and forth from pop gaze to poetic recitations on “Mephisto in the Water,” damaged “I Called,” and “I Got No Strings.” Love her creativity and guts.
Brian Krasman is a contributing writer for Trib Total Media.
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments â either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.