Clairton police seek burglary suspect
A Clairton man is wanted on charges of aggravated assault and other offenses in connection with a burglary in the city.
Bobby Stanford Johnson, 44, is wanted for aggravated assault, criminal trespass, burglary, attempted burglary, conspiracy, recklessly endangering another person, theft by unlawful taking and terroristic threats, according to court documents.
Officers were dispatched on Monday shortly after 9 p.m. to the 200 block of Spruce Street for a burglary in progress involving a man with a gun.
Victims reported they found their home's door open, and located near the residence was a blue van with a black woman inside, according to court documents.
A man, later identified as Johnson, was confronted by the victims, who told him they would call the police. Johnson allegedly lifted his shirt and showed a gun in his waistband, and told the victims, “Do not call them.”
Court documents indicate another man was involved, but he left the scene. He later was identified as Jordan Spencer, 19, of Clairton and is charged with criminal trespass, burglary, conspiracy and theft by unlawful taking.
Officers were able to identify the driver of the van, Dehlia Brown, 35, of Clairton, who told police she did not know Johnson was not allowed in the house, and that he was her ex-boyfriend.
Brown is charged with conspiracy, unsworn falsification to authorities, theft by unlawful taking and obstructing administration of law.
Johnson is described as a black man standing 6 feet tall, weighing 230 pounds with brown hair and brown eyes.
Anyone with information regarding Johnson's whereabouts should contact police at 412-233-6213.
Michael DiVittorio is a staff writer for Trib Total Media. He can be reached at 412-664-9161, ext. 1965, or email@example.com.
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments â either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.