West Mifflin blaze remains under investigation
West Mifflin police, firefighters and the Allegheny County Fire Marshal's office continue to investigate the cause of a house fire along Sylvan Avenue.
Authorities at the scene declined to speculate if fireworks may have sparked the Thursday night blaze.
Homeowner Bill Margita told Trib Total Media news exchange partner WPXI-11 that he planned to fix the vacant home and sell it to his daughter. He said he believed the blaze was caused by fireworks.
“There was a tree in the side back there, in the back porch, that's gone,” Margita said. “It looks like that tree must have caught the house on fire and burned up the back of the house. That's why I'm thinking the fireworks came off the hill and did it.”
The house had working utilities that were disconnected as part of firefighters' response to the blaze.
“I think about other people, what they lose, so I guess I'm in the category with one of them that's supposed to lose. As long as I got a job, that's all that counts. This stuff, I can always collect again,” Margita said.
It took firefighters approximately an hour to get the two-alarm blaze under control.
“Due to where the house is sitting and how it's situated, we called for a second alarm for manpower and additional resources,” Duquesne Annex Volunteer Fire Co. fire Chief Sean Lear said.
Companies from Homestead, Dravosburg, Glassport, Whitaker and Duquesne answered the call and Salvation Army Disaster Services was on the scene. Port Vue firefighters were on standby at the Duquesne Annex station. No injuries were reported.
Lear said the fire appears to have started at the rear of the three-story brick structure.
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments â either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.