Pennsylvania education union applauds Duquesne support contract
A Pennsylvania State Education Association spokesman on Monday applauded a tentative three-year contract between Duquesne City School District and its support personnel.
“Regardless of the outcome with the elementary program, the district recognizes that they will continue to need secretarial and custodial support (in Duquesne Education Center),” PSEA field director Butch Santicola said. “The local thought it was a fair and equitable contract.”
The pact was reached with PSEA-affiliated Duquesne Educational Support Personnel Association on June 26, a day after district court-appointed receiver Paul B. Long conducted his latest public business meeting.
Long affirmed at that meeting that the district is preparing for fall classes at Duquesne Education Center. He was unable to reach an agreement with West Mifflin Area or Pittsburgh Public Schools about a voluntary transfer of elementary students, the preferred scenario in his plan for the district's fiscal recovery.
On Friday, Long confirmed the agreement in a required quarterly report to Allegheny County Common Pleas Judge Judith L.A. Friedman.
“Both the professional staff and support staff bargaining units, respectively the Duquesne Education Association and the Duquesne Education Support Personnel Association, have been working since July 1, 2012, under the terms of status quo contracts,” Long pointed out.
Talks continue with DEA, the district teachers union.
Santicola was commenting on Long's report, which was posted on the www.dukecitysd.org site.
Neither Long nor Santicola gave other details of the DESPA pact.
Patrick Cloonan is a staff writer for Trib Total Media. tribweb.com.
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.