Glassport homeowner waives charges from marijuana raid
The owner of a Glassport home where approximately 100 marijuana plants were found during a police raid waived a preliminary hearing on Tuesday before Magisterial District Judge Armand Martin.
Beau Zimmerman, 73, is charged with two felony counts for the alleged manufacture and delivery of drugs, and two misdemeanor counts of prohibited acts. A misdemeanor count was withdrawn by Allegheny County Assistant District Attorney Bryan Hanlon.
Glassport police discovered the plants on June 21.
They also found bags of marijuana residue and equipment used for growing.
Zimmerman, who reportedly lives in West Mifflin but has a Liberty mailing address, remains free on an unsecured $20,000 bond pending formal arraignment on Aug. 23 in Pittsburgh.
His attorney Justin J. Ketchel declined comment.
Zimmerman's Glassport neighbors on four nearby streets said his Harrison Street duplex “has been a nuisance property for the last 20 years,” and they are seeking to shut it down.
A letter obtained by The Daily News has 57 signatures and is critical of Zimmerman and others who live in the duplex.
“Zimmerman and his tenants have been dealing drugs,” the letter says.
“Their customers have people pulling up to the property all hours.”
The neighbors say they are “tired of paying taxes for properties we cannot enjoy because our neighbor has God only know(s) who living next to us and is selling God only know(s) what.”
Several expressed disappointment that they could not bring their concern before Martin.
They said they will bring it up at Glassport council's meeting on Tuesday.
Patrick Cloonan is a staff writer for Trib Total Media. He can be reached at 412-664-9161 ext. 1967, or email@example.com.
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments â either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.