Clairton man awaits trial on multiple counts
A Clairton man has waived to court assault and firearms charges stemming from a domestic incident.
Terry Julian, 32, is charged with burglary, firearms not to be carried without a license, two counts of aggravated assault, two counts of recklessly endangering another person and two counts of terroristic threats.
Online court documents indicate Julian waived his case to court at Magisterial District Judge Pat A. Capolupo's office on Wednesday, Glassport Magisterial District Judge Armand A. Martin recused himself on Tuesday.
Formal arraignment is scheduled for Sept. 3 at 11 a.m.
Clairton police investigating the July 4 incident on Eighth Street said Julian allegedly entered the residence through a back door and did not have permission to be there.
Two women who were at the residence alleged that Julian brandished a firearm and ordered everyone to leave.
One woman told police that Julian sent a picture of a firearm in the waistband of khaki pants to her cellphone five minutes prior to his arrival.
Julian's father told police that his other son had a firearm that had been reported missing.
Julian later told police he had hidden the gun, then showed officers where it was located, according to court documents.
Police said Julian and the recovered firearm matched the cellphone photo.
Julian's bail was reduced from $50,000 to 10 percent of $10,000, and that $1,000 was posted Wednesday, according to court records.
Michael DiVittorio is a staff writer for Trib Total Media. He can be reached at 412-664-9161, ext. 1965, or firstname.lastname@example.org.
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments â either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.