Clairton man charged in Renzie Park shooting
A Clairton man is charged with attempted homicide and other offenses in connection with a shooting in McKeesport's Renziehausen Park.
The victim, a 21-year-old man from McKeesport, walked into UPMC McKeesport on Tuesday night with a gunshot to his left thumb, police said.
Officers were working crowd control near the main pavilion around 10:49 p.m. when a disturbance occurred about 15 yards from police vehicles.
Officers observed man, later identified as Brandon Murphy, 21, wearing a white T-shirt, discharge approximately six shots from a firearm in the direction of a white Ford Crown Victoria, according to the criminal complaint.
Police saw Murphy run at a full sprint through the wooded area of the park toward Eden Park Boulevard.
The vehicle drifted forward and wrecked into a wooden fence in front of the park's concession stand, the report indicated.
More officers responded, including K-9 units, and pursued the suspect. Officers located a black handgun on the sidewalk along the 2000 block of Barnsdale Street.
Murphy was discovered next to a portable restroom adjacent to Helen Richey Field, approximately 15 yards from where the gun was found, court documents read.
Murphy is charged with aggravated assault, criminal attempt — homicide, possession of instruments of a crime and three counts of recklessly endangering another person.
Police said the victim said he was standing next to the white car when he was shot. His injuries are non-life threatening.
Anyone with information about the incident is asked to contact McKeesport Police Department at 412-675-5015.
Michael DiVittorio is a staff writer for Trib Total Media. He can be reached at 412-664-9161, ext. 1965, or firstname.lastname@example.org.
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments â either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.