Dental expert called in to ID Forward body
Allegheny County investigators will call upon a dental expert to help determine the identity of a man found fatally shot early on Sunday inside a burning Forward Township home.
The fire caused extensive damage to the house along the 400 block of Bunola River Road. The man whose body was found inside was pronounced dead at the scene at 2:22 a.m.
“It's been turned over to county homicide,” Forward police Chief Mark Holtzman said on Monday. “They are still in the midst of the investigation.”
County detectives and the county fire marshal's office did not return calls seeking comment by presstime.
A supervisor in the county medical examiner's office said Monday that the cause of death was a gunshot to the head, but the manner of death remained undetermined.
Some broadcast media outlets reported that the victim is the home's owner, James D. Stirbis, 54, but that had not been confirmed.
Police and the medical examiner's office said the body was burned beyond recognition.
A supervisor said an odontologist will examine pre-mortem and post-mortem X-rays on Tuesday.
According to county real estate records, Stirbis has owned the house since 2000. He purchased it for $30,000, but its value had increased to $90,000 in a recent assessment.
Stirbis did not request an appeal, according to the county's website.
Patrick Cloonan is a staff writer for Trib Total Media. He can be reached at 412-664-9161, ext. 1967, or firstname.lastname@example.org.
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments â either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.