Crime Stoppers seeks public help in McKeesport homicide
Pittsburgh Crime Stoppers seeks help from the public with the investigation of a McKeesport homicide.
James Andre Lane Sims, 20, was shot several times, including once in the head, on July 6, 2012, while sitting in his black Dodge Charger at the intersection of Pirl Street and Versailles Avenue.
Police were flagged down along the 2800 block of Versailles Avenue when someone informed them a person had been shot at the intersection. When officers responded they found the victim. Sims died five days later when his family removed him from life support.
More than 100 friends and family members gathered along Versailles Avenue to mark the one-year anniversary of Sims' death.
His mother, Wanda Sims, remembered her son as a hard worker who had jobs at Taco Bell and at Alorica's West Mifflin call center — where his mother worked — to support his new family.
She said she has been in contact with McKeesport and Allegheny County police, who have told her there is not enough evidence to implicate a suspect in the shooting.
Anyone with information concerning this case is asked to call Pittsburgh Crime Stoppers at 412-255-8477.
A reward of up to $1,000 is offered for information leading to the arrest and prosecution of individuals wanted for featured crimes. Callers may remain anonymous.
Michael DiVittorio is a staff writer for Trib Total Media. He can be reached at 412-664-9161, ext. 1965, or email@example.com.
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments â either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.