Homestead Community Day successful despite limited fundraising
Homestead officials said the borough's community day last month was a great success despite it falling short of a goal of being a self-sustaining event.
Councilwoman Zaneta Hines said during Thursday's meeting that the July 13 event at the borough's Frick Park missed the break-even mark by $1,604.30, an amount that will be made up by the borough.
She noted the total cost of staging the event was $6,244.73. Advanced fundraising contributed $4,640.73.
Hines, in her first year as event organizer, was apologetic to fellow councilors.
“It was my first time,” Hines said. “I did the best I could.”
Budgetary matters aside, she said the community celebration was nevertheless a success that enjoyed support from local and regional leaders, businesses and individuals, who deserved to be thanked.
She said Homestead photographer Thomas Jefferson filmed the festivities and created a 12-minute DVD of highlights from the event, which can be purchased at the borough building for $5.
Councilman Lloyd Cunningham said the sale of the DVDs will be used to fund future community events.
In other news, council approved the hiring of three new crossing guards for the school year ahead.
Mahogany Fitzgerald, Serena Sisco and Mary Harris were hired at a rate of $12.67 per hour. Their positions are contingent upon passing background safety checks.
Eric Slagle is a staff writer for Trib Total Media. He can be reached at 412-664-9161, ext. 1957, or email@example.com.
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments â either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.