Allegheny asset hearings slated
Allegheny Regional Asset District's board of directors will begin its hearings on 2014 allocations on Tuesday at 3 p.m.
The hearings will take place on Tuesdays and Thursdays through Sept. 10 in the ninth floor conference center in the Koppers Building, 436 Seventh Ave., downtown Pittsburgh.
The first week of those hearings will focus on contractual assets, long-term recipients of funding drawn from Allegheny County's 1-cent sales tax.
On Tuesday, Phipps Conservatory and Botanical Gardens, the Allegheny County Library Association, Carnegie Library of Pittsburgh and Pittsburgh's Citiparks will testify, along with an annual recipient, the Pittsburgh Symphony Orchestra.
The ACLA includes more than 40 community libraries across the county, including those serving Mon-Yough municipalities.
A board business meeting will follow those hearings at 5 p.m.
On Thursday, McKeesport city officials will present the case for Renziehausen Park at 5 p.m.
It's the last of a series of contractual asset presentations that also include Pittsburgh Zoo & PPG Aquarium, National Aviary in Pittsburgh, Allegheny County regional parks and Carnegie Museums in Pittsburgh.
The regional parks locally include White Oak, Round Hill in Elizabeth Township, Boyce in Monroeville and South Park.
Annual assets begin making their pitches on Aug. 27. Those of local interest scheduled to appear include:
• Port Authority of Allegheny County on Aug. 27 at 5:10 p.m.
• McKeesport Symphony Society on Sept. 3 at 3:36 p.m.
• Bulgarian-Macedonian National Educational & Cultural Center on Sept. 3 at 4:08 p.m.
• McKeesport Little Theater on Sept. 10 at 3:52 p.m.
• Mon River Arts on Sept. 10 at 4:32 p.m.
More details are at radworkshere.org.
Patrick Cloonan is a staff writer for Trib Total Media.
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments â either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.