Pleasant Hills Council accepts uniform bargaining agreement
Pleasant Hills Council on Monday conditionally accepted a uniform collective bargaining agreement with the borough's police department.
The contract awaits approval by Teamsters Local 205.
Police have been working without a contract since their three-year pact expired on Dec. 31. Solicitor Fred Jug said the new contract would be retroactive to Jan. 1.
It includes a wage increase for the borough's 16 officers of 2.5 percent in the first and fourth years, and 3 percent in the second and third years.
Council's acceptance is contingent upon the union's approval of an increase to 10 percent in the officers' contribution to health care, retroactive to June 1.
Negotiations continue for the non-uniform collective bargaining agreement, which includes office, borough authority and public works employees.
Councilman William Trimbath said the next round of non-uniform negotiations is tentatively set for Aug. 29.
Council accepted a $6,651 bid from Marshall Powers for the sale of a 1996 Ford F350 dump truck with snow plow.
Council OK'd transfer of eight sewer taps to the Pleasant Hills Authority at a cost of $1,000 per tap pending approval by the state Department of Environmental Protection.
Council approved participation in Economic Development South this year, and to participate next year with a financial contribution to be determined during the budget process.
Economic Development South is a nonprofit community development corporation serving Brentwood, Whitehall, Baldwin and portions of Pittsburgh. It revitalizes the area along the Route 51 corridor.
“This organization has had quite a bit of success at getting grants and moving projects forward,” Councilman Gregory Smith said. “We can look forward to seeing what they might be able to do in Pleasant Hills,”
Rickie Davis Fink is a contributing writer for Trib Total Media.
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.
Subscribe today! Click here for our subscription offers.