Two bodies found in crumpled car in McKeesport
By Tim Karan
Published: Friday, Aug. 23, 2013, 12:07 a.m.
Allegheny County homicide detectives will try to determine whether two people found inside the crumpled remains of a car that rolled over a McKeesport hillside were shot or died in the accident.
Police responded to a call about gunshots and a car over the wooded hillside at Riverview Street around 9 p.m. Thursday, said Capt. Tim Hanna. They found two bodies inside the car.
The car, a gray or silver sedan, was wedged into the hillside. Hanna said police intended to leave it until county detectives arrived, but a sudden and severe rainfall made the site too dangerous.
“There was no way they were going to get down to it,” Hanna said. “So we (used a tow truck and) pulled the car up over the hill.”
Hanna said it was unclear if the victims were shot.
“We can't confirm that yet,” he said. “We did have a call of four shots fired in the area, but we don't know if that's connected.”
Terry Glenn, who reported the incident to police, said he didn't know if the gunfire was related to the crash.
“I heard gunshots and saw lights coming up from over the side of the hill,” he said. “I didn't get a good look because I wanted to protect my family and took them to the back of the house.”
County homicide detectives will investigate.
Tim Karan is a Trib Total Media staff writer. Reach him at 412-664-9161, ext. 1970, or firstname.lastname@example.org.
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.
- Experience the best teacher for Clairton student
- Driller preps for Forward decision
- Library tax adds to West Homestead budget
- McKeesport center part of Cal’s digital storytelling class project
- Versailles fire displaces couple on Third Street