North Side man charged in Homestead assault of woman, 82
A North Side man accused of assaulting an elderly woman outside a Homestead church has been arrested.
Michael Kofi Duku, 18, was arrested at home by state constables on Wednesday morning in connection with an attack on an 82-year-old woman in the 900 block of Ann Street on Aug. 18.
Duku is accused of assaulting the woman as she and her sister walked to their vehicle following a Mass at St. Nicholas Orthodox Church. The victim was hospitalized with head and shoulder injuries; Homestead police said she was released on Wednesday.
Duku is one of two men allegedly involved in the attack. Police said they stole the victim's purse, which was recovered a short distance from the crime scene the morning of the incident.
“It kind of struck home,” Homestead police Chief Jeff DeSimone said. “When we have an 82-year-old woman who is brutalized like this, it could be any one of our mothers or fathers.”
“We're just glad that we could bring him in,” the chief said, noting the incident was upsetting to the church and community.
He said the second suspect remains at large.
Duku is charged with aggravated assault, simple assault, reckless endangerment of another person, robbery, receiving stolen property and criminal conspiracy. He is being held in Allegheny County Jail on $75,000 bail.
Eric Slagle is a staff writer for Trib Total Media. He can be reached at 412-664-9161, ext. 1966, or firstname.lastname@example.org.
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments â either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.