Charges filed in Harrison Village shooting case
A Rankin man is charged with shooting at a building in McKeesport's Harrison Village during an argument.
Melton Goodlow, 45, has a preliminary hearing scheduled on Sept. 16 before Magisterial District Judge Eugene Riazzi on charges of discharging a firearm into an occupied structure, person not to possess firearms, criminal mischief and two counts each of aggravated assault and recklessly endangering another person.
Charges stem from an incident on Thursday at 1:50 p.m. at Building 3 in Harrison Village.
Capt. of Detectives Tim Hanna said Goodlow was arguing with a resident who allegedly stole the suspect's car in Rankin the day before.
Hanna explained that the Harrison Village resident took the car to return to McKeesport.
“Everybody here is familiar with each other,” he said.
According to police, Goodlow immediately pulled a gun upon approaching the apartment door and attempted to squeeze the trigger while screaming about the car.
The Harrison Village resident and a woman retreated inside and heard two shots strike the building, according to police reports.
Hanna said officers recovered two spent shell casings at the scene.
Officers responding to the area noticed a man walking out of the area, who later matched the description given by the Harrison Village resident, Hanna said.
Officers saw the man getting into a car that was described by the victim.
Rankin police were notified and arrested Goodlow. They returned him to McKeesport at the city department's request, and he later was charged.
No injuries were reported.
Michael DiVittorio is a staff writer for Trib Total Media. He can be reached at 412-664-9161, ext. 1965, or firstname.lastname@example.org.
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments â either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.