Marton nixes Fallen Timber takeover
Although Western Pennsylvania Humane Society has made much of White Oak Animal Safe Haven's proximity to the soon-to-be-closed Fallen Timber Shelter, that's about as much of a connection as the White Oak shelter cares to have.
On Monday, White Oak Animal Safe Haven president and founder Ina Jean Marton said there was “no interest” in acquiring the Fallen Timber property.
“We're staying in White Oak,” said Marton, the borough's mayor. Her shelter is approximately 9.5 miles from the Fallen Timber Shelter in Elizabeth Township, which is to close on Sept. 30.
“We will welcome volunteers,” Marton said.
Marton said she does not expect to take any animals from Fallen Timber.
“We're a small shelter,” she said.
In announcing the closure, the humane society said its board of directors is working to determine future uses for the shelter property.
Since The Daily News published stories last week about the closure, some supporters of the Fallen Timber Shelter have expressed their concerns.
“I donated $500 to Fallen Timber,” Andy Grese of Elizabeth Township recalled on Monday. “I told them I wanted my dog to be mentioned (as the donor), that my dog is donating to her friends.”
Grese said a picture of his dog hangs at the Elizabeth Township shelter.
“I blame everything on the management,” Grese said. “If I thought (my donation) was going to Pittsburgh (where the society has its other operation) I wouldn't have given it.”
Patrick Cloonan is a staff writer for Trib Total Media. He can be reached at 412-664-9161 ext. 1967, or firstname.lastname@example.org.
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.