McKeesport man held for trial in pizza delivery robbery
A McKeesport man charged with robbing a Homestead pizza delivery driver is headed to trial.
Maris Chandler, 52, remains lodged in the Allegheny County Jail on $50,000 bond stemming from a preliminary hearing on Wednesday.
Magisterial District Judge Thomas R. Torkowsky held for court charges of theft by unlawful taking, unlawful restraint, conspiracy and three different felony grades of robbery.
Charges stem from an incident on May 19 at 12:23 a.m. along the 800 block of Amity Street.
The pizza delivery man reportedly was walking along the street when he was approached by a black man wearing a black shirt with two yellow vertical stripes who said, “Can you help for a minute with this?”
The delivery man then was grabbed and forced into an apartment hallway and forced against a wall by the man and another person, according to court documents.
The second suspect is not identified in the criminal complaint. Chandler is named as the man with the striped shirt.
The victim reported a knife was held to his throat and his life was threatened by the other man, who was wearing a camouflage shirt. The victim was struck in the head and sustained a laceration.
Items reported stolen included a black serrated “buck” knife, between $70 and $80 in cash, an electronic cigarette and Ray Ban sunglasses.
Anyone with information regarding the incident should contact Homestead police at 412-461-1340.
Michael DiVittorio is a staff writer for Trib Total Media. He can be reached at 412-664-9161, ext. 1965, or email@example.com.
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments â either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.