ShareThis Page

McKeesport school building projects progressing

| Thursday, Sept. 19, 2013, 4:51 a.m.
Cindy Shegan Keeley | Daily News
Admiring the large group instruction/community room are McKeesport Area School Board member Mary Jane Keller and president, Patricia Maksin. This room will feature auditorium style seating.
Cindy Shegan Keeley | Daily News
Joseph M. Brennan of PJ Dick and McKeesport Area Superintendent Timothy Gabauer and Assistant Superintendent Rula Skezas review progress that is being made on the new Twin Rivers Primary/Intermediate School.
Cindy Shegan Keeley | Daily News
McKeesport Area School District and construction managers examine blueprints in what will become the library of Twin Rivers Primary/Intermediate.
Cindy Shegan Keeley | Daily News
Lots of windows will make the cafeteria of the new Twin Rivers Primary/Intermediate School bright and airy.

McKeesport Area School District is making progress in building construction with visible strides on the Twin Rivers Primary/Intermediate grounds and paper pushing for the addition of a Sixth Grade Academy onto Founders' Hall Middle School.

District officials toured Twin Rivers — the K-5 building that is taking shape on the former site of Cornell Middle School — on Wednesday afternoon for a firsthand progress report, then attened an Act 34 hearing and special meeting about the next big project.

Twin Rivers is set for completion before students return from winter break in 2014, and construction at Founders' Hall is set to begin next month.

Originally planned to open with the 2014-15 school year, the Sixth Grade Academy at Founders' Hall was the solution to a nixed elementary alignment plan that would have divided all students in kindergarten through sixth grade into three primary/intermediate buildings. With the elimination of plans for a third school, the board majority instead went with a two-building K-5 plan at Francis McClure and Twin Rivers and moved sixth-graders to a separate wing on the district middle school.

That addition, which was subject to a public hearing and approval earlier this year, came back to the board on Wednesday night because of increased estimated cost.

The Act 34 maximum building cost based on bids is $9,178,592, and the maximum project cost based on bids is $17,085,078. That is a jump from the original estimated building construction cost of $7,656,756 and estimated maximum project cost of $14,486,088. The project cost includes hard cost for new construction and renovations, site work and soft costs.

“The total was exceeded by more than 8 percent with the actual bids, necessitating a second Act 34 public hearing,” architect Ryan Pierce of JC Pierce LLC explained.

The project is expected to impact district property tax rates by 1.097 mills.

When the construction plan documents — PlanCon Parts D, E, F and G — for Founders' Hall came up for a vote during a special meeting that followed the hearing, directors Chris Halaszynski and Steve Kondrosky Sr. voted against them. Directors Joe Lopretto and Mark Holtzman were absent.

Because the board majority had five votes in favor of the construction plan and its projected millage impact, Halaszynski and Kondrosky said their “no” votes were in protest with no real threat of stopping the project.

“It's against what we have been talking about since day one,” Kondrosky said. “Raising taxes would impact every household in the district. This whole project started out at about $7 million and ended up at about $17 million.”

While the project cost increased over time with discussions about improvements to the existing Founders' Hall facilities — not simply an addition — they said years of planning for realignment and construction should have been planned better from the get-go.

“I'm just tired of wasted spending with no one blinking at it,” Halaszynski said. “We spend millions like we're at a penny candy store.”

Scott Smith, a cross-filed nominee for school board in November's general election, shared concern that the project time line will be extended far past its original deadline of August 2014.

“Now that we've had our second Act 34 hearing, this now has to go to the state again,” Smith said. “How does that impact the start of the project schedule as well as the completion?”

While the estimated completion date was set back to October 2014 prior to the solicitation of bids, Superintendent Timothy Gabauer said the new date likely will not be affected by the need for a second Act 34 hearing and subsequent green light from the state.

Despite disagreements over Founders' Hall, there remains an enthusiasm for the Twin Rivers project.

Gabauer said the new building will be an impressive place for teachers and students.

“With the conditions they've been in ... I sense the excitement they're going to have,” Gabauer said. “They are in places where it's hot or there might be paint peeling. They're going to come in to an absolutely gorgeous building ... A new, bright building changes everything.”

The intermediate wing is roughly 95 percent complete. Walls and color-coded door thresholds are painted. Lighting fixtures and classroom white boards are in place. Restrooms are complete without fixtures.

The primary wing is nearly enclosed and ready for drywall. Furniture bids are set to be approved during next week's board meeting.

“When the parents come in, they will know that their children have the same facilities and opportunities as other places, if not better,” Gabauer said.

Jennifer R. Vertullo is a staff writer for Trib Total Media. She can be reached at 412-664-9161 ext. 1956, or

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.