Condemned Glassport house comes down
Demolition crews tore down a Glassport home damaged during the summer when a sewer main failed during a series of heavy rainstorms.
Joanne and Jerry Wirbicki stood by Thursday as a hydraulic excavator tore down what until July had been their family home.
Their house in the 500 block of Cypress Way sustained serious foundation damage when a nearby municipal sewer collapsed, causing storm water run-off to back up around their property.
“I said I wasn't going to watch this but it's like a car wreck,” said Joanne Wirbicki. “You can't look away.”
Jerry Wirbicki, who was hospitalized with a heart problem after his home was flooded for a fourth time over a two-week period in July, said he's not as stressed now as he was in the midst of the ordeal.
“I'm worn out,” he said. “We just want it to be over. We can get another house.”
Glassport claimed possession of the Wirbicki's home through eminent domain in August. Officials said then the house had to be leveled for the damaged main to be properly repaired.
The Wirbickis, who have been staying with family since July, have retained a lawyer and are trying to get compensation for their loss from their insurance company and the borough.
Glassport Mayor Michael Evanovich, who visited the demolition scene, declined comment on legal matters surrounding the Wirbicki's home.
He said the teardown was not something the borough wanted to do.
“It is a necessary procedure,” the mayor said. “This is as difficult for me as it is for them.”
Evanovich said repair work on the damaged sewer main should begin on Monday.
He said the hope is that the 500 block of Cypress Alley will be reopened to through traffic by the end of next week.
Eric Slagle is a staff writer for Trib Total Media. He can be reached at 412-664-9161, ext. 1966, or email@example.com.
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments â either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.