Medical examiner rules in Munhall man's death
Allegheny County Medical Examiner's office said a Munhall man died of gunshots to the trunk and extremities during a violent exchange early Tuesday.
Authorities said Andrew Emmett Stevens, 23, died in a shootout with John Rozgonyi, 58, during a break-in at the garage behind Rozgonyi's Munhall home.
A forensic investigator said the office policy is to not release how many wounds may have occurred. He said the manner of death was homicide.
County police said District Attorney Stephen A. Zappala Jr.'s office would investigate to determine if any charges should be filed against Rozgonyi.
A spokesman for Zappala said Thursday his office is waiting for county investigators to provide all reports about the shooting.
Shaun Conroy, 24, of Munhall, was arrested as an alleged accomplice of Stevens. He was arraigned Tuesday afternoon before Magisterial District Judge Eugene F. Riazzi Jr. in McKeesport on charges of burglary involving an overnight accommodation where no person was present, and conspiracy.
Conroy is free on $25,000 bond pending a hearing on Wednesday at 1 p.m. before Magisterial District Judge Thomas R. Torkowsky in Munhall.
Funeral arrangements for Stevens are being handled by Savolskis-Wasik-Glenn Funeral Home in Munhall. Visitation is planned this afternoon and tonight, with funeral Mass on Saturday at 9:30 a.m. at St. Therese Church in Munhall.
The funeral home's website obituary noted Stevens served as a Marine corporal in Afghanistan.
Patrick Cloonan is a staff writer for Trib Total Media. He can be reached at 412-664-9161 ext. 1967, or email@example.com.
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments â either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.